Intrigued?
Want to know more about the debate between science and evolution?
Then you will enjoy learning more in this book...
Science vs. Evolution

Scientists discuss why the non-historical dating techniques are unreliable, and why evolutionary theory based on them is not sound.
- Ban Chiang painted pottery may only be from first millennium
- Examples of innacuracies in radiocarbon dates of recent specimens
- Half life ages of uranium and thorium differ drammatically
- Lava dome of Mount St. Helens in 1980 falsely dates to millions of years in age
- Mass Spectrometer shows dates that correspond with creation theory
- Noahs Flood Can Explain Why There Are Problems With Carbon Dating
- Problems with radiocarbon dating are deep and serious
- Radioactive ages of lava beds laid down in the same month differ by millions of years
- Radiocarbon dates regularly discarded according to biases of researcher
- Radiocarbon dating does not agree with potassium argon dating in lava flows
- Research evidence contradicts theories of slow peat bog formation
- Researchers admit they only use the C-14 dates that match their theories
- Sunset Crater age differs dramatically between tree-ring and potassium ages
- Uranium decay rates may have varied in the past
Related articles from other sections:

