Browse Space
Intrigued?
Want to know more about the debate between science and evolution?
Then you will enjoy learning more in this book...
Science vs. Evolution
"C-14 dating was being discussed at a symposium on
the prehistory of the Nile Valley. A famous American
colleague, Professor Brew, briefly summarized a common
attitude among archaeologists toward it, as follows:
'If a C-14 date supports our theories, we put it in the
main text. If it does not entirely contradict them, we put
it in a footnote. And if it is completely 'out-of-date,' we
just drop it."—*T. Save-Soderbergh and *Ingrid U.
Olsson, "C-14 Dating and Egyptian Chronology," Radiocarbon
Variations and Absolute Chronology, ed.
*Ingrid U. Olsson (1970), p. 35 [also in *Pensee, 3(1):
44].
Other related topics:
Ban Chiang painted pottery may only be from first millennium
(Facts About Evolution)
Labels: ban-chian-pottery, ban-chiang, pottery, dating-methods, thermoluminescence, radiocarbon
|
|
Examples of innacuracies in radiocarbon dates of recent specimens
(Facts About Evolution)
Labels: isotopes, inaccuracy, dating-methods, radiocarbon
|
|
Mass Spectrometer shows dates that correspond with creation theory
(Facts About Evolution)
Labels: radiocarbon, c-14, spectrometer, coal, petroleum, creation, dating-methods, fossils
|
|
Noahs Flood Can Explain Why There Are Problems With Carbon Dating
(Facts About Evolution)
Labels: c-14, catastrophe, carbon-inventory, coal, forrests, atmosphere, flood, radiocarbon
|
|
Problems with radiocarbon dating are deep and serious
(Facts About Evolution)
Labels: inaccuracy, dating-methods, radiocarbon
|
